1. Feast of St. Matthew
    September 21, 2017
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB

    I am thinking this morning of the famous painting of Caravaggio in the church of San Luigi in Rome, the Calling of St. Matthew.

    Jesus stands off to the side with that pointy finger of his, looking for the world like God almighty in Michelangelo’s Creation.

    He stands there with his pointy finger, pointing at the tax collector and says: Follow me. Yes, you. You dirt bag: Follow me.

    Matthew has been called. The message is clear. And yet, there are some kinks in the armor here, a few problems, particularly for those who like to take their Church with a cube of sugar and not straight from the pot and undiluted.

    Matthew has been called and so have we.

    From the rancid, reeking, rear room of some dilapidated tavern, a clarion voice, a more-than-angel voice cries out across the din of pollution, Follow me

    And brothers and sisters, we are compelled to follow. There is no choice but following. If we wish to escape we must follow. If we wish to survive the melee of human compromise, we must follow. If we hope to see the bright heights of Zion, shining out as a hill resplendent over the plains of Sodom and Gomora, we must follow.

    If we hope for any whiff of glory in the rancidness of mendacity we must follow. If we strive for anything at all beyond our sin, beyond our hopelessness, we must follow. If we need something other than the wretchedness we inherit, a wretchedness stewing in our cups like the dregs of a cheap brew on the table of a tacky bar. We must follow.

    Who are you?

    Are you a tax collector?

    Follow me

    Are you the scum of the earth?

    Follow me

    Are you in the backwash of civilization?

    Follow me

    Are you a thief?

    Follow me

    Are you a cheat?

    Follow me

    Are you a massive, egotistical jerk?

    Follow me
    Are you a procrastinator in the eschatological business plan?

    Follow me

    Are you addicted to drugs?

    Follow me

    Are you addicted to porn?

    Follow me

    Are you addicted to yourself?

    Follow me

    ARE YOU ADDICTED TO ADDICTION

    Follow me

    Are you lazy?

    Follow me

    Are you a puppy panting at the heels of any master who happens to stop by?

    Follow me

    Are you a jackass?

    Follow me

    Are you a bright young thing?

    Follow me

    Are you longing for your girlfriend?

    Follow me

    Are you longing for anyone else?

    Follow me

    Are you struggling with your past?

    Follow me

    Are you doubtful about your future?

    Follow me

    There are no complications here. There is no fine print, even though we are always looking 
    for complications and fine print.

    O Jesus with your pointy finger, thanks but I cannot go?

    Who me?

    What?

    I’m a mess

    I’m a latecomer

    I’m worthless

    I’m a dumbass

    I’m a secret this or that

    I’m a flirt

    I’m a piece of crap

    I’m loud

    I’m stupid

    I’m stupid because my stupid parents told me I was

    I’m a sinner

    I’m a sinner

    I’m a sinner

    I’m a sinner

    I’m a sinner

    Jesus says: Welcome to the club

    It never ends this litany of unworthiness

    Look to Matthew

    God doesn’t give a crap what you have been

    God cares, deeply, scaringly cares who you are today, and who you will be tomorrow.

    God’s dream for us cancels without repetition the “are yous” and the “I ams”


    Go and learn the meaning of the words,
    I desire mercy, not sacrifice. I did not come to call the righteous but sinners

    Image Source

  2. Rector's Conference
    September 10, 2017
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB

    In my rector’s conferences this semester, I would like to take a slightly different approach to looking at and hopefully expressing an appropriate spiritual ideal for the diocesan priest. I would like to examine diocesan priesthood in the context of Benedictine monastic vows. You should know that this project has a complicated and somewhat troubled past. For many years, we were loath to talk about Benedictine values in light of our apostolate here for fear that we might “contaminate” the authentic diocesan spirit we had spent the past 150 years attempting to inculcate. I will never forget twenty or so years ago, I was presenting a program for the USCCB conference in, then, Washington and at the end of my presentation, one of the bishops asked me point blank what Benedictines could possibly have to offer diocesan students. In those days, I was more reserved. I might have a different answer today than I had then.

    So tonight I would like to begin this semester-long endeavor by examining the most unique of Benedictine vows, the vow of stability.

    Stability: What does it mean in the monastic context? Stabilitas has the unique meaning in the monastic world of tying the Benedictine monk, not to a religious order, but to a place, a very specific place, a monastery, in a context culturally, to a monastery that has a certain history, certain traditions and certain eccentricities. I am not so much a Benedictine monk as a monk of Saint Meinrad and so stability is about being at home in a certain place, creating family in a certain place, acknowledging my destiny in a certain place. In a very real way the vow of stability and its particular permanence defines the way in which the other vows are realized.

    And we know of course that this, like the other vows is a counter-cultural trend. We live in a culture of choice and a culture of transition. We must change constantly to keep up with the demands of what is going on around us. We live in the perpetual new and the perpetual now. Yesterday is something that needs to disappear and the anticipation of tomorrow is foremost in collective imaginations. And yet there is something within us that strives after stability, yearns for something fixed and permanent. Sometimes we cannot understand it or adequately articulate it because it is so profoundly anti-cultural.

    Let me translate this for the diocesan priesthood. The first task of the diocesan priesthood is BEING THERE. It is being in a place at a particular time. The idea of incardination is one that is firmly fixed in canon law. The priest MUST be attached in a permanent way to a particular place. He cannot be a gyrovague, that is one that moves around. And so each of you diocesan seminarians is already searching within for something like permanence, experienced corporeally in the hills and valley, the flat plains, the fields, the city streets, the country roads, the farms, the skyscrapers of your native places. All of you have within you the tastes of that place, the food, the smells, the sometimes enigmatic sound of the wind across a particular prairie. All of you imprinted on you an idea of home, and as far as you are exiled here, you long for that place, or you try to recreate it in food, in language, in relationships, in spoken moments and unspoken times as well.

    This is the stability of parish life, with its common practices, its music, its ideals, its hierarchies, its pot-luck suppers. The stability of the parish is realized in the family names that predominate the rolls, that are written on the stained-glass windows and inscribed on the headstones in the cemetery. Go to any country parish church and know stability in the ideals presented there in very tangible ways and intangible ways. This stabilitas is a sacred reality, a function of generations. As priests, sometimes new to particular settings you must tread about with care. In fact, it might be necessary to put on their shoes and walk around, at least initially, in the rutted paths laid out generations before you showed up or before you were born.

    And of course, there is the stability of diocesan life with its own set of rules and regulations, its traditions, its sacred places and times. Bishops know this very well when they step into a new diocese. They must learn the timbre of their men, they must learn how they think and where their loyalties are. They must also know that moving too fast or too recklessly disturbs the peace of stabilitas. That is not to say they should not lead, stability needs concrete leadership not to turn into stagnation, stability is there so that careful progress may be made, but it must be respected and read with the care of a kind of poetry, or even Holy Writ in order to acknowledge the sanctity of what is there.

    Of course, all of this begins with seminary life. Your first task as seminarians is being here. You must learn to do that not only physically but spiritually, mentally, and emotionally as well. Stability in the seminary gives you the anchor to truly be formed. Instead of mentally, intellectually, physically roaming the earth, you are tied to this place. You are called to find something deep and real here. Deep and real requires a a commitment, a commitment to certain values.

    What does that look like? What are the values we promote?

    First, I would say it is the value of brotherhood. There are many different kinds of family as we know. We have moved from large extended families to smaller families in much of US culture. We have examined in our own context of the Catholic Church the centrality of family, in, for example the writings of St. John Paul II. We know there are many good things about families, and many ideals. We also know that sometimes these ideals are realized very well and sometimes they are not. I know of very few families that have not experienced tears at one time or another. Tears and sometimes angry words are a part of growing up. Some families also deal with the realities of abuse and sometimes they do not deal with the reality of abuse. When we are honest we know that there are challenging things in every family and occasionally the challenging things outweigh the benefits. Family and brotherhood, of the kind we experience here is not a calculus. We do not weigh this reality against this reality and find things missing and then give up. Brotherhood is like a poker game. You play the hand you receive and your skill in playing that well determines the outcome. I do know this, no one ever won a hand of poker by wishing things were completely different. If we are a family, we have our challenges as well. I can assure you as the paterfamilias I want to play the hand we have been dealt to the full. Brotherhood and stability mean living with the people we have been given by God to live with and then … thriving in it, not by shading the faults but by a common sense of responsibility that helps others overcome their challenges and live into the fullness of God’s love. No matter what your experience of family HAS BEEN, we are going to ask you to challenge yourself to something new, something different, something whole.

    The same reality applies to friendship. You are given the chance here, in the stability of this place to make friends for life. At the meeting I attended this summer, Archbishop Wong made the comment that anyone in a seminary who does not have friends, should not be ordained. By friends, I mean true friends and not followers or disciples. Occasionally someone will pass through seminary life who sees his role more as cult leader than friend. Friendships involve a mutual vulnerability, it is a giving and receiving of important things. Ask yourself this: Am I frustrated in a relationship because I perceive I am giving much more than I am receiving. That is not friendship, it is co-dependence if you feel you need to give everything and get nothing but you cannot get out of the relationship. Sometimes, friendships can tilt in one way or another but eventually right themselves, sometimes friendships are life affirming and sometimes they are more problematic.  Sometimes you can learn more about being a priest by working through the problematic relationships in your life, authentically working through them than in any other way, because friendships are hard but stability, staying with them is necessary to thrive. In other words, I need friendships in order to be authentically human, no man is an island as the poet Dunne says. I also need to have established a place in order to keep those friendships alive. I also need something that is occasionally lacking in the world today, a sense of the face-to-face. When I have a friendship there needs to be a physical exchange in that relationship, I need to know my friend in a corporeal way, looking him or her in the eye. This cannot be achieved only through social media. Skin is an essential component of friendship.

    Finally, success in stability in a place like this requires a trust in authority. As in the monastery we must trust our superiors. That is a real key to surviving in the Catholic Church. That implies a recognition of what I call true fatherhood. I can tell you that here we want to teach you true fatherhood fully aware that a sense of stability in any family is often judged by the availability of the father.   Our pledge is to be spiritual fathers to you not perfect fathers. None of us can be perfect. Your biological parents cannot be perfect. We want to give you a good example. We do. Here we want to teach you true fatherhood. We will trust you knowing how vulnerable you are. We want you to trust us. You can trust us. You must trust us. The quality of your formation is in proportion to the quality of your trust. The man who is untrustworthy OR the man who cannot trust others cannot be a priest. The fearful man cannot be a priest. Fear paralyzes. And that applies to the fathers and to the sons here.

    Stability is a key to true fatherhood, knowing that someone is going to come home at night and that someone is there for you is central to personal idenitity and central to priestly identity. It makes you the kind of man you will be.

    Stability gives you the insurance to find out who you are as a man determines and that determines who you will be as a priest.
    Are you a cowardly man?
    Are you a heroic man?
    Are you a timid man?
    Are you a bold man?
    Are you a man who fears himself morally, sexually, emotionally?
    Are you a man who knows that you have faults but is not afraid to deal with them?
    Stability is the condition of self-knowledge and that knowledge is key to your identity with the priesthood of Jesus Christ because, of all things, Jesus understood who he was. He was not afraid of the internal stability necessary to identify my gifts and my challenges. We ask a lot from you but I hope that you realize that it is possible because you see US giving everything we have to build up the kingdom in this little stable corner of the Church. Stability also means your knowing that we on the formation staff, that I have one reason for living, to build you up into the greatest priest that you can be.





  3. Third Reflection for Deacons of Spirituality Week 2017
    August 31, 2017
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB

    There can be no question that the priesthood is a complex reality. In the seminary, we approach it from a variety of angles: theological, pastoral, spiritual and human. Each angle gives us new insight, an insight that likewise grows as our experience of the priesthood deepens and broadens. Archbishop Sheen once remarked: “‘Increase and multiply’ is a law of sacerdotal life no less than biological life.” (The Priest Is Not His Own, 57). While Sheen was speaking of the question of spiritual generation in the priest’s ministry, the observation is no less valid of the evolving understanding of the priesthood in the life of the seminarian and, indeed, of the priest throughout his life. Our appreciation of the priesthood must continue to grow and change. “Growth is the only evidence of life,” as Blessed John Henry Newman has observed. This evolution of priestly realization is also innate in the rites that create the priest. The identity of the priest naturally progresses through the various ministries, candidacy, diaconate and, finally, presbyteral ordination.

    In the last reflection, I looked rather carefully at the resolutions made by the deacon at his ordination. There is so much of significance in the diaconate ordination, including constitutive elements of the priesthood, the promise of celibacy and the Liturgy of the Hours being the most prominent. In this reflection, I would like to turn to the particular resolutions made by the priest. In our context, we speak most often of a transitional diaconate. While the permanent diaconate, also a prominent feature of the Saint Meinrad landscape, ultimately finds its spiritual energy in the promises we discussed several weeks ago, those ordained to the transitional diaconate know that the resolutions made at deacon ordination are evolving resolutions; they will be augmented by the future ordination to the priesthood. They are by no means abrogated. The promise to pray the Liturgy of the Hours and the promise of celibacy remain the foundation of what will be additionally taken on with priesthood.

    The transitional deacon must prepare himself for a strengthening of resolve with new promises. These new promises continue to show forth the nature of priestly life and spirituality. With presbyteral ordination, the deacon becomes an even more public person, a man for the Church. This is true because, as a priest, he stands at the very fulcrum of the Church’s life, the sacrifice of the Eucharist.

    Before I reflect on the particular promises of the presbyteral order, I would like to offer a few insights about the nature of this public person. The priest affects the lives of his parishioners in profound ways, ways that may not always be readily apparent. We have heard it stated in many forums that the priest is a public person and must always act accordingly. The priest, however, is more than a public person in the sense of celebrities or politicians. The priest is a man whose engagement with the public, that is, the people, is of a profound nature. The priest is a man who is scrutinized and studied by the people not because his life is interesting in itself, but because his life is presented as an icon of discipleship. Our Holy Father Pope Benedict has expressed this well:
    The priest is a man of prayer, a man of forgiveness, a man who receives and celebrates the sacraments as acts of prayer and encounter with the Lord. He is a man of charity, lived and practiced, thus all the simple acts, conversion, encounter, everything that needs to be done, become spiritual acts in communion with Christ. (Meeting with the Clergy of the Diocese of Rome, 2007)
    These acts are also acts meant to be observed by others. In his prayer, in his moral life, in his example of Christian living, everything is observed not because of prurience or any other base motive, but because the priest has presented himself as an example for others. He is an icon of discipleship. He shows himself as one who can live the life of the Gospel, not perfectly but intentionally. His life shows the people that it is possible. He is also a man of the Church. He faithfully represents the Church and never represents any ideas or opinions that, as his own, constitute a challenge to the Church’s way of thinking and acting. As a public man of the Church, he cannot act contrary to the laws and the spirit of the Church. He is watched. He is evaluated and, even when the people cannot quite give expression to their misgivings, they know when he is inauthentic. They know. We live today in a culture accustomed to casual communication. Facebook, My Space and other social networking tools give us access to easy formats by which we can express our opinions and ideas. A seminarian or a priest might easily be tempted to make a comment or express an opinion on the wall of Facebook that he would never consider saying in a classroom or in the pulpit. After all, Facebook is “just among friends,” and yet, millions of persons have access to these comments, many times more than would be the case in any parish environment.

    Our thoughts and our teachings are analyzed, taken apart and taken to heart. As the poet Emily Dickinson once wrote: “We must be careful what we say, no bird resumes its egg.” (Letters of Emily Dickinson). Is this observation meant to instill some kind of paranoia or, worse, to silence the authentic voice of the priest in his mission to “Go out to all the world and tell the Good News”? By no means. Nevertheless, the priest must be constantly aware of that with which he is dealing. As priests, we are touching people’s souls; we are trafficking in the realm of their immortality. It is one thing to offer my opinion about the quality of the latest film; it is another to comment on Church teaching or liturgical practice when those teachings have the power to alter people’s lives. As priests, we have the power to alter people’s lives, their eternal lives, and that must give us pause; it must give us a sense of heightened responsibility.

    With ordination, we are taking on a new identity, an identity that can never be set aside. I cannot begin to instill in you an awareness of the tremendous damage done by priests who ask others to listen intently to their opinions about the Church and its teachings and then walk away, leaving a confused public to sort through what is authentic and inauthentic in their words. There is no room in the Church today for priests who present themselves as the saviors of the Church. There is one savior, our Lord Jesus Christ. It is His message that our public ministry must tirelessly proclaim. In the words of St. John the Baptist: “He must increase, while I must decrease.”

    With this insight into the public nature of what we are doing, I turn now to the resolutions of the Rite of Ordination for Presbyters.

    Do you resolve to exercise the ministry of the word worthily and wisely, preaching the Gospel and teaching the Catholic faith?

    The first resolution seems to be, at least at first glance, in the intellectual mode. It focuses on the word. And yet, perhaps the expression “ministry of the word” is more profound. While the word might refer to the “logos” of our faith, it might equally refer to the second person of the Holy Trinity. As priests, we are called to exercise the ministry of the Word, of Jesus Christ. Pope Benedict has remarked: “The first imperative of the priest is to be a man of God in the sense of a man in friendship with Christ.” (Meeting with the Clergy of the Dioceses of Belluno-Feltere and Treviso, 2007)

    This can only be accomplished through a complete identity with Christ the Word. In our lives as disciples, many “words” compete for our attention. Some of these words are spoken internally, the scripts that we learn in childhood and tend to rehearse throughout our lives. We are constantly mulling over such scripted words as “unworthy,” “stupid,” “broken” and a host of others, each unique to our personal situations. Some of these scripted words may be near the surface of our consciousness and some may be deeply embedded in our psychological makeup, affecting our lives in adverse ways, robber-like against our knowledge and will. Some of these competing words come from our socialization and conditioning. The scripts of our cultural environment have a strong hold over us; they often call for unqualified allegiance, even when we know, at least intuitively, that they are at odds with what we profess as Christians and as Catholics.

    In childhood, we might refer to this as the words spoken by peer pressure. Peer pressure does not evaporate as we grow older; it merely becomes more sophisticated. It is always pressure. As the historian Christopher Dawson has expressed: “Every society rests in the last resort on the recognition of common principles and common ideals, and if it makes no moral or spiritual appeal to the loyalty of its members, it must inevitably fall to pieces.” What is left in the aftermath of this disintegration of the social word than the ministry of the Word? Internally or externally, we give our attention to these words and yet the Word desires so completely to break into our lives.

    The exercise of the ministry of the word faithfully and wisely means, first and foremost, our ability to filter all words that do not speak to us that single syllable that alone has meaning in the heart of the priest: Christ. There is only one word for us to authentically speak and that is Christ. Christ must be everything and our ministry of that word becomes our sole direction, our singular purpose. I exercise the ministry worthily when I put away all false representations of allegiance. “You call me Lord and teacher and you are right, for so I am” (John 13:13). And yet, as Cardinal Von Balthasar has noted: “It is in us that Jesus wants to stand before the Father, indeed, in us that he wants to be in the Father.” (Credo, 41). I am worthy of the ministry (as much as I can be worthy of the ministry) insofar as I live with an undivided heart. The landscape of my heart must be totally for Christ and the expanses of my mind and my intellect, the horizons of my service will be open and pure.

    As much as that word is compartmentalized, there is my unworthiness. Worthiness to minster the Word does not stem from living a blameless life. There are no blameless lives. There are no lives in which the cacophony of other wordiness does not interfere with a pure attention to the voice of God. We all live conflicted lives. We all live lives of mixed motives. We all live sinful lives. That is not the question. We are not, on our own, worthy of the ministry of the word. But God makes us worthy and we participate in that divine action by our desire. As much as I desire to live a secret life or a double life, I am truly not worthy. As much as I desire to make my life as a priest an open book, even in the midst of authentically acknowledging my need for further growth, greater grace, I have been found worthy.

    In the rite of ordination, after the call of the candidate, the bishop inquires of the one who has acted on behalf of the Church in issuing the call if the candidate has been found worthy. There is a testimony on his behalf that he has been found worthy. Another way to phrase this interchange that gets at the heart of the spirituality of the priest is that he has been found humble, humble enough to know himself, humble enough to acknowledge his faults, humble enough to live a transparent life.

    The candidate for priestly orders resolves also to exercise his ministry wisely. Wisdom, in this context, is intimately related to worthiness. Worthiness is directed toward the development of the candidate’s personal character. Wisdom is directed outward. What is this wisdom? It is the understanding that what is within me (if I can authentically claim what is within me) is also within those whom I serve in the ministry of the word. We do not pastor perfect sheep. There is no perfection in the flock. Nor can we present ourselves as perfect pastors. The wise shepherd does not expect the flock to be perfect; rather he knows in an intimate way their imperfections. He has conditioned himself to this by his own introspection, his own self-awareness.

    Pastors can get into real trouble when they fail to acknowledge the real situations of their flocks. Trouble can only ensue when a pastor presents himself as faultless, minister of an idealized church and then expects the flock to either conform or be weeded out. That is not to say we do not need ideals; again, we do, but we never reach the ideal without first wading through the mire, both internally and externally. We are wise pastors when we know the sheep and help them along because we know our selves and know how God has helped us along. Ministry that is worthy and wise is the ministry of real men among real men and women. Preaching and teaching can only proceed from this intimate knowledge. All other preaching and teaching will be perceived as false, façade, mere Potemkin villages of authentic discipleship.

    In the seminary, we certainly practice preaching and teaching. These are essential communication skills for the priest. At another level, however, the seminary must also be a seedbed of worthiness and wisdom. Regarding worthiness, as I have stated many times before, it is necessary to inculcate here the ability to express true humility through transparency. What does this transparency look like but the development of mature character. As J.C. Watts has expressed so eloquently: “Character is doing the right thing when nobody’s looking. There are too many people who think that the only thing that’s right is to get by, and the only thing that’s wrong is to get caught.” The honesty that this character formation necessitates can only happen in an atmosphere of mutual trust and respect. As pastor, it is essential for me to set the tone. As a staff, we are called to be authentic examples of this. We trust one another and we have respect for one another when we honestly communicate.

    One way in which we do this is through our annual self-evaluation process. Ideally, the seminarian should never hear anything in that process from the evaluation team members that he has not already heard many times from his dean, the vice rector or the rector. No seminarian should be taken off guard by what appears in the evaluation. Likewise, the staff should never be taken off guard by what happens in the evaluation. If I reveal in the evaluation something that I have never revealed before in the external forum, that indicates a lack of transparency. Wisdom and worthiness are not qualities that happen overnight; they are not the magical results of ordination, rather with the author of proverbs we know: “By wisdom a house is built, and through understanding it is established; through knowledge its rooms are filled with rare and beautiful treasures” (Proverbs 24:3-4) and “My son, preserve sound judgment and discernment, do not let them out of your sight; they will be life for you, an ornament to grace your neck. Then you will go on your way in safety, and your foot will not stumble” (Proverbs 3:21-23).

    Do you resolve to celebrate faithfully and reverently, in accord with the Church’s tradition, the mysteries of Christ, especially the sacrifice of the Eucharist and the sacrament of Reconciliation, for the glory of God and the sanctification of the Christian people?

    Here we find the particular ministry of the priest: The sacrifice of the Eucharist and the sacrament of Reconciliation. These are the responsibilities of the priest and so the character of priestly spirituality must be built around these responsibilities. What does it mean to promise to faithfully and reverently celebrate the sacrifice of the Eucharist? It entails a deep commitment to the reality of the Eucharist and its place in the life of the world. As the Holy Father has remarked, the secret of the priest’s sanctification lies precisely in the Eucharist: “…the priest must be first and foremost an adorer who contemplates the Eucharist” (Angelus, 18 September 2005). The priest is called through his priestly ministry and identity to continually point to the significance of the Eucharistic sacrifice for the life of the world. He can never, by word or action or attitude, indicate any marginality of this central truth of our faith. We need the Eucharist. The world needs the Eucharist because it needs Christ. The sacrifice of the Eucharist as Christus prologatus is the presence of God in the life of the world. This centrality is real and must be realized whether we are believers or not.

    There is nothing more central to the world than the presence of Christ. Do we always realize that or do we trivialize the importance of the sacrament by making its celebration just another aspect of our day? The developing spirituality of the priest must be a spirituality centered on the Eucharistic Christ. As stated in Presbyterorum Ordinis: “All ecclesiastical ministries and works of the apostolate are bound up with the Eucharist and are directed towards it [14]. For in the most blessed Eucharist is contained the whole spiritual good of the Church, [15] namely Christ himself our Pasch, and the living bread which gives life to men through his flesh—that flesh which is given life and gives life through the Holy Spirit.” This is accomplished, first and foremost, by paying attention to the quality of our celebration of the Holy Mass each day. Critical or judgmental attitudes about the Eucharistic celebration can have the effect of devaluing the central mystery that we are acknowledging. Refusal to participate in this or that aspect of the Holy Mass because it does not suit my particular liturgical taste is insulting to the presence of the Divine Savior on the altar, in the Word, in the ministerial priesthood and in the assembly. Critical and judgmental attitudes inject a decided selfishness into the Mass.

    The Eucharistic spirituality of the priest is also cultivated in the daily Holy Hour. In the words of Pope John Paul II: “Our communal worship at Mass must go together with our personal worship of Jesus in Eucharistic adoration in order that our love may be complete.” (Pope John Paul II, Redemptionis Hominis). The Holy Hour is a privileged time not only because it is a time spent with our Lord in silence and reverence, but also because the face-to-face encounter with Christ in the tabernacle or in the monstrance is a reminder of the truth that He is also present in palpable ways outside of the chapel. Our encounter with Christ in the privileged Holy Hour is a rehearsal for additional encounters made each day in more mundane but equally sacred settings: the nursing home, the parish school, the RCIA group and dozens of others.

    There is a beautiful image at the end of Robert Hugh Benson’s novel, The Lord of the World, of the end of time and all of creation being drawn into the Lord present on the altar in the monstrance. The cosmic implications of the Eucharist draw all of us into its power. What a privilege and responsibility to be the custodians of that sacramental presence. How can the entirety of our lives not be devoted to its celebration? Eucharistic spirituality cultivated in the seminarian and realized in the life of the priest is also the ability to closely identify oneself with the Christ whom we make present in the sacrifice of the altar. “This is my body. This is my blood” are not words we speak only on behalf of Christ, but words that also echo our commitment to be in persona Christi, to offer ourselves, our body and blood, for the people. Fr. Stephen Rosetti has commented: “The priest at the altar dies and rises with Jesus.” (Born of the Eucharist, 97). Eucharistic spirituality is the cultivation of a healthy sacrificial spirituality in the sense of not always putting my own needs first, of being willing to go the extra mile, of carrying the cross and encouraging others. If there is no cost to priesthood, then there is probably not a very authentic expression of the priesthood. True, we must take care of ourselves, but at what point does self-care become an attitude of privilege, entitlement or comfort?

    The second aspect of this resolution is faithfully celebrating the sacrament of Reconciliation. Quite obviously, this means the need to hear sacramental confessions and offer absolution. We know how much the world is in need of this sacrament and we also know how little it is sometimes used. Reconciliation is a central ministry of the priest. It is also tied to the Eucharist. We bring together in order to make the body of Christ a real presence among us. Offering the sacrament of Reconciliation is necessary for the exercise of authentic priesthood. “Priests must encourage the faithful to come to the sacrament of Penance and must make themselves available to celebrate this sacrament each time Christians reasonably ask for it” (CCC 1494). Canon law requires the priest to regularly participate in this sacrament (CJC, 276, 5). No priest can ever refuse to hear a confession unless he prohibited from doing so because of particular relationships (for example, being rector of a seminary). Priests must make themselves available for the celebration of this sacrament when it is needed and required.

    Reconciliation is also a central attitude of the priest. In order to be a worthy minister of God’s forgiveness, I need to experience that forgiveness in my life. My participation in the sacrament of Reconciliation is a necessary precursor to my ability to be a good confessor. Again in Presbyterorum Ordinis we read: The priest receives grace for the healing of human weakness from the holiness of Christ, who became for us a high priest, holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinner.” Therefore, cultivation of the attitude of reconciliation is also necessary outside of the formal confines of the Church’s sacramental system. Am I an agent of peace and reconciliation in the community or am I continually the cause of division? Gossip, the spreading of false or unsubstantiated rumors, the inability to avoid controversy and drama, a persistent critical attitude, the inability to confront others in charity, the inability to receive correction, talking about people behind their backs, publicly processing difficulties to all willing to listen to my complaints: all of these are contraindications of the ability to cultivate the attitude of reconciliation essential to the ministry of the priest. How can I effectively preach and announce in the confessional the joy of heaven when I am forever raising hell behind the scenes?

    Eucharist and reconciliation are the foundations of priestly life and spirituality. We cultivate our awareness of these sacraments as necessary precursors to celebrating them. Why? The resolution also tells us this: for the glory of God and the sanctification of the people. Not for our glory do we cultivate and celebrate, but because God gives us an agency to announce His Glory for the sanctification of His people. God gives us the agency. It is a profound responsibility when we see the centrality of these sacraments to the life of the world. In the words of St. Paul: “To him alone be glory in the Church, now and forever.”

    Do you resolve to implore with us God’s mercy upon the people entrusted to your care by observing the command to pray without ceasing?

    Pray without ceasing. St. Paul’s injunction in the first letter to the Thessalonians (5:17) is central to the life and ministry of the priest. At one level, this promise has already been made in the promise of the deacon to pray the Liturgy of the Hours. Here the stakes are raised a little higher. While the Liturgy of the Hours remains at the core of clerical responsibility by virtue of its being the prayer of the Church, the command to pray without ceasing goes further. The priest is called to implore God’s mercy upon the people. The direction of our lives is toward God through the people whom we serve. We live with a constant awareness of two things: the needs of those whom we serve and the greatness of God to fulfill those needs. The priest acts as a living conduit between these realities. First, the spirituality of the priest is directed toward an awareness of the needs of the people. We must know them. We must respect them. We must honor them precisely in their brokenness. The priest is privileged to know the inner lives of the people God has given him to serve. We know their fears, their pain, their pasts, their addictions, their sins, their confusions, their aspirations, their dreams and their disappointments.

    Our task is to attend to these realities. We must live among those whom we serve. We must be willing to hear them, open to listening and responding. “I am the Good Shepherd. I know my sheep and they know me” (John 10:27). This aspect of priestly spirituality prohibits us ever sending messages that they are not welcome, that we are not willing. Our response to all of these realities is to bring them to God. We cannot solve the problems of the people. As your pastor in this community, I cannot solve every dilemma you have. I can bring you to someone who can, Jesus the Lord. The life of the priest, then, is a life of spiritual referral. We constantly call upon the name of the Lord. We pray without ceasing from the midst of life’s turmoil’s, tragedies and triumphs. In all things, we give God the glory for He intends to do so much for us. Likewise, we witness the efficacy of this conducting among the people by what God has done for us. If we are not convinced that God is the author and caretaker of all in our lives, then we will not be very credible witnesses to His power in the lives of others. The exhortation of the first letter of St. Peter applies beautifully here: “Tend the flock of God that is your charge, not by constraint but willingly, not for shameful gain but eagerly,  not as domineering over those in your charge but being examples to the flock”.

    Do your resolve to be united more closely every day to Christ the High Priest, who offered himself for us to the Father as a pure sacrifice, and with him to consecrate yourself to God for the salvation of all?

    How can we hope to do this? We are asked, in no uncertain terms, to consecrate ourselves completely to God. What does this imply? One thing I believe: by little and by little, less of the exasperating stumbling block of ego to inhibit the fulfillment of our mission. Again Archbishop Sheen: “The priest is not only the shepherd who cares for his sheep, he is also the lamb who is offered in caring for them.” (The Priest Is Not His Own, 29). How is this sacrificial nature of the priesthood realized? I would say in three distinct ways: (1) by the priest’s simplicity of life; (2) by his openness to serve; and (3) by his singleheartedness. The priesthood must be lived with a simplicity that is observable. Here I do not mean to imply that simplicity is merely a matter of putting away material possessions. Material possessions play a part in simplicity of life, without a doubt, but true simplicity of life is not attained merely by possessing little. There are many bitter and ideologically confused priests living in bare rooms.

    True simplicity of life is obtained by detachment. The philosopher Simone Weil has said: “There is no detachment where there is no pain. And there is no pain endured without hatred or lying unless detachment is present too.” We cannot hope to achieve the sacrificial aspects of priestly service without regret, without hatred or lying, if we cannot separate ourselves from that which, at times, we view as most essential to ourselves, our opinions, our personal truths and our so-called freedoms. Bede Griffiths said: “[Simplicity] is detachment from the self. This is the most radical detachment of all. But what is the self? The self is the principle of reason and responsibility in us. It is the root of freedom, it is what makes us men.” It is not necessarily what makes us saints. Detachment and simplicity, which lead to a kind of interior martyrdom, guide us to God because they instill in us a desire for God alone. Detachment means putting aside all kinds of ambition, self-determination and self-serving, striving after a single goal, the goal of St. Paul in the letter to the Galatians: “It is no longer I who live but Christ who lives in me” (Galatians, 2, 20). This desire is a kind of self-immolation, and by that I mean not an immolation of the authentic and wonderful aspects of our personalities. Detachment and self-denial are not denials of my personal charms, charisms and perhaps quirks. They are rather a desire to turn the particularity of my personal character to the service of God alone.

    Second, this sacrificial quality is achieved by our openness to serve, truly serve, the needs of others. As I stated above, part of this recognition of the needs of the flock is a recognition of their desires. To serve the needs of others means that I serve them in their needs and not in my own. True, I must lead. I must provide a vision, but I cannot force that vision on an unwilling flock when they are languishing in their own questions, problems and authentic pastoral desires. It is the needs of the flock that I must serve. My attitude as a pastor will make all the difference in the way I will serve them. How open am I? Let’s consider that in the context of what we must do here. What do my brothers need and how willing am I to listen to those needs? As I stated in the opening reflection for this year, you have ample opportunities to serve real pastoral needs in this community. Can we begin to practice the art of sacrificial priesthood by authentically giving ourselves in service to those real needs? “If we do not love a brother, whom we have seen, we cannot love God, whom we have not seen.” In the words of the Roman playwright, Terence: “Charity begins at home.”

    Finally, a sacrificial priesthood is governed by singleheartedness. The poet Gerard Manley Hopkins once said: “Christ plays in ten thousand places, lovely in eyes and limbs not his – to the Father through the feature of men’s faces.” Singleheartedness is not the dogged stubbornness of only seeking commerce with the sacred, but in finding the sacred in the daily distillation of human life. It is easy enough to choose the things of this world that are pleasing to my spiritual sensibilities and live among them, detaching myself from the flotsam and jetsam of reality. It is more difficult to find myself immersed in the quicksand of culture and find God’s arms there. Our message is a message that the reality of God pervades every aspect of His creation. Our hearts are restless, however, because that reality has been coated, painted over, disguised. God wants to shine forth in His creation and our determination to be instruments of that illumination, monstrances of the divine persona showing forth the presence of God in every circumstance is the sacrifice we must make to live authentic priesthoods.

    We cannot become imbued with the cynicism of the world. We must be beacons of hope and understanding, calling forth from the depths of the human experience the light of Christ, a light that burns in all men and women, a light we must be convinced burns in us. We cannot do this alone, but we can do it together; we can support and encourage one another in dark times, through stormy days. We can lift one another up in the ecstasy of prayer and in the simplicity of true care, concern, love. We can be Christ for one another rather than agents of the critical and unyielding devil. We can love. We can love with all our hearts. God has given us the promise of single hearts, single and holy for Him and for our brothers and sisters. He has given us the materials to make us saints and to call us into that divine assembly. Give Him glory today. Love Him today in the faces of one another. Become vessels of sacrificial love today, vessels like that most precious of all disciples, the mother of priests, Our Blessed Lady.

    Image Source



  4. Non-Negotiables
    September 6, 2017
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB

    I want to spend a few moments this morning offering some reflections on formation and at least some of the principles, the ideals that govern our life together here. A seminary can be, perhaps must be a fragile ecosystem. We are all here for a particular purpose. We are all here to test ourselves, sometimes to the limit, whether we understand that testing as academic, spiritual, pastoral, or personal. Seminary formation is difficult and it requires not only all that you have, but all that we have in creating and maintaining a formation environment that is healthy and whole.

    With these ideals in mind, I would like to offer some comments today that fall into two distinct categories. The first is what our responsibilities are in formation, both yours and ours on the formation staff. First of all, as you have heard me say before this is a community of adults and it is a community primarily concerned with forming adult men for the priesthood. That means that we are always going to treat you like adults. We are not going to hide things from you, we are not here to play games. I can guarantee you that I have no energy or stomach for playing games. You are here to be formed for the priesthood and we are presuming that you take that seriously AND that you take your life seriously. While this is a community of men, it is not a fraternity house. A positive sense of recreation is important but all of us need to ask ourselves here: what is my reputation among others in the community. I think it should be first and foremost as a man of prayer. When people are in need, when their families are in need, are they coming to me for prayers because they perceive me as a man of prayer, or am I better known as the “life of the party”? Be the life of the party, within reason, but also be known as a man of serious intent and prayer, a man seen in the chapel as well as the gym, a man distinguished in the classroom as much as in the unstable. I said this is a community of adults and open and honest communication is essential. If there are issues in this regard you will hear from me. In terms of our responsibilities, another I will mention in a particular way this morning is attendance. If you are going to miss class or be away communicate with your dean and faculty members for your classes. If you are ill or need some attention, let your dean or one of the infirmarians know. If you are absent from morning prayer or Mass, let your dean know why. This is a community of adults, so don’t make us come looking for you. These are responsibilities we have to make our home a true house of prayer and formation, nothing cuts into the fiber of a community’s morale more that someone who will not pull his weight.

    The second category that my remarks fall into this morning is what are already familiar to our returning seminarians as the non-negotiables. Clarity about our purpose here also means that I have the responsibility to point to a few principles that in a community of Christian living and a community of formation must be considered non-negotiable. By non-negotiable I am stating without hesitation and confidently that the serious infraction of these ideals means that the individual can no longer live here and be formed for ministry. I also want to give you concrete examples of what a serious infraction would entail. That is for the good of the Church. That is meeting the needs of the Church

    The first of these principles is chastity. Living a chaste life here is an absolute value that must be maintained. It must be. Failure to live a chaste life, whether that is through overt sexual activity, a seemingly incurable addiction to pornography, inappropriate humor, or the inability to deal with others in a sexually appropriate way either physically or verbally, is an infringement not only of Christian values but on the trust we must have in one another. Living a chaste life is not easy. Many here struggle with temptations and overcome them. Some do not. I am not talking about struggle here. Struggling heroically to live the chaste life is part of who we are as Christian men and women. Whether we are married, single, or have made a promise or vow of celibacy, the chaste life is a struggle, for some more than others. We have many resources here to help you live a chaste life. We have our counseling center which has done wonders for so many, including me. We have understanding formation staff members who only ask for honesty in dealing with difficult questions. But honesty is necessary.  It is a violent affront to those who struggle heroically to live the ideal of chastity when a person takes that ideal less than seriously. Transgressions against chastity that warrant a severing of the formation relationship include any physical genital activity with another person, but would also include aggressive physical advances that are unwanted. Here I would also include going to establishments where casual sexual relationships are the order of the day. One of the things we must learn at the beginning of formation to guard against is damage to our reputations. Often we can be misled into thinking: I can go there. No one will know. Brothers and sisters, God knows and frankly, so do others.  If you have doubts about what I mean by this, ask me. Believe me, I will tell you. Living a life of chastity also means a serious commitment to address the question of internet pornography. How can we have a vision of the life of God if our visions are clouded with exploitation and degeneracy of the beauty of human sexuality? If you have a problem with internet pornography, please get some help for that problem. If you would like to talk about it in the external forum see me. It is probably better for you to see me than for me to have to see you.

    A second principle that insures the good order of a house of formation is sobriety. While the use of alcohol is not regulated as in some other institutions, an incident of public drunkenness is unacceptable. Alcohol, if it is used, must be used responsibly. For some, because of their particular circumstances this applies in a more concrete way. Sobriety is the mark of a good priest and no priest should find his reputation damaged by the improper use of alcohol or any other substances. A beer in the UnStable is one thing. Six beers in your room is something else. If your claim to fame is your liquor cabinet, you many need to stand back and reprioritize. The use of alcohol is often tied to a lowering of inhibitions. Do not threaten to compromise your integrity, your reputation or your virtue because you are under stress. Learn to deal with stress in ways that do not involve alcohol.  Likewise the use of any illegal substance is unacceptable. The priest needs good judgment and artificial means of compromising that judgment is behavior incompatible with the priestly state. At this point you may say: Why isn’t there regulation? Why do you have an on-campus bar? Brothers, there is no regulation “out there”. Teaching you to control yourself can only be accomplished in the context of what is there. My forbidding you to have beer in your rooms will frankly not keep you from having beer in your rooms. I do not inhabit that fool’s paradise. Sobriety is also a singular ideal of a person of prayer. Again, if you need help in this area you need only ask someone. Help is yours. It will be given happily and freely but to struggle in secret, to keep my excessive drinking a secret is not serving the Church. We have already seen far too much of that.

    A third important principle of this community is charity toward others. We must learn to show kindness and generosity to others. It is essential not only to our life here but to our lives as priests as well. Showing blatant disrespect to others through acts of physical or verbal abuse is unacceptable behavior that indicates a seminarian’s lack of ability to be formed for the priesthood. This is a house of charity. In all that we do, the love of God must be foremost. I also know that this is a house of mostly men. It is a house where base competitiveness can take over. It is a house where some base instincts can guide the day when the going gets tough. How we handle stress and how we deal with difficult situations and, dare I say, people, is a mark of our character. The priest needs only one instance of losing his temper or an act of physical violence to damage his reputation forever.  But again, this is a house of mostly men and a little give and take is not only to be expected, it is probably necessary provided that it is given in the spirit of camaraderie. If you feel hurt by the way in which others express themselves, please speak to them about it. I dare say they probably never meant to hurt your feelings.

    I mention these essential values and the behaviors that compromise these values for the sake of clarity. As we progress in our resolve to live the life of discipleship in the particular vocation of the priesthood, we are called to an increasing accountability for our actions. If you have questions about these, please talk to your deans, talk to me. I hope that all of you know that this is place of real conversation, where real questions can be raised without threat. This is a place bent on assisting you in becoming the best you can be. I hope that you come to appreciate that in the coming days, months and years. I hope you come to see that this is really a place of safety and trust. There is no problem that cannot be overcome, if we deal with it honestly.

    Again, I hope this place is a place of adult approaches to the world, a place of trust and a place where the staff, while not your friends, can be your guides and mentors in a serious way. I look forward to this coming year, of getting to know our new men more personally and our old men more deeply. My door is always open and my blessings and prayers are with you each and every day.





  5. Opening Comments for Deacons
    September 6, 2017
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB

    I wanted to have the chance to speak with you this morning to consider a few things related to the coming formation year, your last year in seminary, as we begin. I have been thinking a great deal about your class this summer because I will say from the outset; I have a great deal of confidence in you, both collectively and individually. I would say, without hesitation, that you have remarkable potential and that is because, somehow, you WORK as a class. You are well-integrated as a class and while there are certain personalities definitely at play, there is also a class personality that all of the staff not only admires but is truly grateful for. With that in mind, I would like to offer you, as we begin, a few challenges.

    The first is the Socratic dictum, “Know Yourself” and I say that, again, both collectively and individually. Know your strengths and know as well your weaknesses. Among your class strengths, I would see some of the following: generosity, kindness, hospitality and a wonderful spirit of service. You had the chance to demonstrate that to the whole school most admirably at our opening banquet last evening. I know, as pastor of the community here, that I can call upon you at any time for really anything and I will receive a ready answer in the affirmative. You are to a man true servants. You have the heart of Christ in that sense. Likewise, I would say, in your service, you are not blowing your own trumpet. You are humble and willing to give without asking for a great deal of recognition in return. I appreciate that because I think that is the very heart of the priesthood.

    The second challenge I would offer you this year is something like this. All of you generally, are known for something, a great gift that you have, a service you offer. That is wonderful, but I want to challenge you to grow into something else. For example, if you are known as a great athlete, also become a great man of prayer. If you are known as a man of prayer, try to outdo your brothers in service. Find and acknowledge your niche and then, grow beyond it. Again, we have so much talent in this class and I want to see it grow more nuanced every day. If you are known as a man who likes a good gathering, try finding some authentic contemplative time. All of that is within your grasp. All of that is possible. The ability to “re-write” your script becomes a critical skill for pastoral ministry in the future. Before long, as you move full-time into parish ministry you are going to be asked to change and use some talents you have that have lain somewhat dormant. That is the challenge.

    Third, I would like to ask you to please be sure to reach out to the new men. There is a tendency to say, as you now come to the terminus of formation, to want to just take care of yourselves, your friends, etc. These new men need you. They need the example that you will give and offer them. The new men look at you, however you engage the rest of the community, they look at you to know how they are going to turn out. I would say if they are looking to you, give them a good example. If they are looking to you and admiring what they see, get to know them, fully acknowledging that after this year, many of your paths may never cross again. Give them all that you have, minister to them. All of you remember what it was like to come to the seminary new. All of you remember the doubts you had about your vocations or your ability to do the hard work of formation. Share your memories with them, help them along. Be for the new men a positive role model to let them know that in spite of doubts and trials, they, like you, can achieve this end and not only achieve it, thrive in it. Show them a positive attitude and if you don’t have a positive attitude to show them, get one.

    Finally, continue to grow here, grow where you are planted. This is your first assignment as a deacon. I am the pastor and you are my deacons. If you give up early, if you have no energy for this place now because you are going to be gone in a few months, what does that say about your character as a man and as a priest? Will you stop hearing confessions when you find out you are being moved to a new parish? Will you stop saying Mass and getting to know new people, because you are going to be transitioning in a few weeks? Live fully in the NOW, here and now, and you will have obtained a skill that is necessary for your future in years to come because unlike Benedictines, you do not take a vow of stability. You will be moving frequently and living and pastoring in the momentous now becomes a crucial skill.

    I am offering you these challenges today not because there is a problem or there is a gap in your class, rather the opposite, there is the ability in this class to not only live up to these challenges but to truly thrive. I have confidence in each of you and collectively that you can offer such a remarkable example to the others that they too can thrive both individually and collectively. I also know that there is no way you will let me down. I am proud to be your pastor and proud to have you as my deacons. In light of all of this, I have asked Mrs. Scherzer to set up a time for us to meet individually. I our meeting I want to hear two things: What was your summer assignment like and what is your personal pastoral plan for this year? Thank you for all that you do and will do. Thank you for being your own crazy and unique selves. Thank you for offering us the faultless example of the service of Christ in this community.






  6.  Address for the Faculty Blessing
    September 5, 2017
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB

    This evening as we do each year, we take the opportunity to do what is fitting and right, that is the blessing of our faculty in their important duty for the coming year. This annual occasion also gives me the chance to speak a few words to us on the important ideals of intellectual formation which we observe in this seminary and school of theology, understanding, of course, that intellectual formation forms a part of an essential matrix, colliding (and hopefully coalescing) as it does with the other dimensions of formation. We know that we are formed by so many things in our lives. We are formed, obviously (and hopefully) by the formal elements of formation. We are formed by our past. We are formed by our circumstances. We are formed by our encounters. This summer I had a very interesting conversation with the font of all wisdom, my secretary. We discussed in great detail how some families seem to have so much going for them. Some families just seem to gel together, not negating the obvious tensions which occasionally arise, but acknowledging that these families are blessed in their basic unity and common striving. Others in our society seem to be consistently at odds with the culture around them, with law, with society, with the principles of living which most of us take for granted. All of this is by way of saying that we form a kind of family here and our dynamic in this family will largely be built upon what we have come to expect from the families from which we originate. If we feel comfortable and confident in our families of origin, we will likewise also feel that here. If we feel alienated and perhaps even threatened in those native families, that will also likely be our experience here. Though not necessarily. We are formed by so many things. I would like to focus this evening on one thing that forms us, our reading.

    This past summer, I did quite a bit of traveling so I had more time even than usual for reading on planes, trains, buses, everywhere. This evening I would like to mention four books that I read, very different books with very different purposes and themes, but four books that I believe speak very readily to the intellectual climate in our world today and of our community here.

    The first book was a biography of Goethe by the German philosopher Rudiger Safranski. A few years ago, I had read Safranski’s short book on Globalization and later his biography of Schopenhauer. Picking up the biography of Goethe I was surprised at how connected the themes of the three books were. The subtitle of the Goethe biography is “life as a work of art”. And the theme is certainly one that resonates with the rich tapestry of Goethe’s ideas. It is a very Romantic idea that life is a drama, a play meant to be carefully performed on the stage of human events. It requires forethought and imagination to not only make sense of the personal drama unfolding in our lives, but also to understand the conventions by which we engage the ever present others. The other day I had an interesting conversation with Mrs. Scherzer about the opioid crisis. I asked her how many people in the little town of Saint Meinrad she thought got high last night, how many in Spencer County. How many people even in our local culture live from fix to fix? There is a kind of intentionality in a life of addiction, but I would say there is little art in it. In his book Safranski challenges the world in which we live, the western Euro-centric world to remember its great teachers. Goethe promoted the idea of life as drama, life as art. Are we making our lives into a work of art or are we surviving? As faculty members, what “background values” are we teaching our students, not so much through our classroom activities, but in the way we live, the way we present ourselves. I am frequently reminded by students that our example as formators and professors is often more impactful, for good or ill, than the words we speak in class. Safranski uses Goethe as a kind of cipher for modern living, a challenge to construct our lives with great intentionality, but also leaving room for the romantic spirit. Are we as faculty opening our classrooms and our lives as works of art? Are we as students committing ourselves to the kind of intentionality of living that makes for good priests and ministers of the Church?

    A second book that I read and one that challenged me very deeply was the novel, The Hearts of Men, by Nickolas Butler. I found this book in the English section of the bookstore in the Rome airport and was interested in it for the cover which shows a boy scout uniform done up like a paper doll outfit with tabs, etc. Needless to say the book is about masculinity, or as we might say around here, the masculine genius. Butler’s book centers on a boys’ summer camp, Camp Chippewa over several generations of campers. It beings in 1962, a very good year to begin things. The book focuses on Nelson who, in the course of the novel, goes through several mutations, 13 year old scout, boyfriend, soldier, scoutmaster, all permutations of the masculine genius, all, pretty much resounding failures, at least from the standpoint of archetypes. The gender question may be the overriding question of modern culture. While it is certainly realized in the legal world, think here bathroom assignment issues, it is also one that plays at the very heart of the human psyche. What does it mean to be a man? Am I living up to the expectations of my culture? Are the expectations of my culture either valid or valuable? These issues have also been played out at the heart of Church life, an attempt to rebuild Christian masculinity, the theology of the body, men’s movements. Many of our students ask the question: Am I living up to the expectations concerning gender that are being placed on me? Am I man enough to be a priest? In the meeting I attended of seminary officials this summer in Rome, this question kept coming up. How do we define gender in a contemporary ecclesial context? Butler’s novel focuses on the image of the summer camp to highlight these questions. Nelson does not live up to the qualities of masculinity that the camp promotes in 1962. Later he becomes a soldier and does not live up to the expectations of the solider. Later he becomes the camp leader and is not able to realize the values promoted in 1962 in the late twentieth century. Nelson is always missing the gender point, and perhaps that is the point. Perhaps in our need to carefully delineate gender roles and expectations, particularly in the Church we are forgetting the person, the unique creation that each one is. Sometimes we can barely delineate our own gender expectations, much less help others figure out theirs. The point of the novel is that this is the point, we must accept fluidity, both personally and interpersonally. While we cannot accept ultimate ambiguity, we must accept some degree of ambiguity if all are not to be pressed into the paper doll reality of costumes, again both internal and external. We must be carefully in a hyper-masculine environment like this that we do not draw the lines so sharply that some despair of mercy.

    My third summer book comes from an author that I have had a great deal of admiration for in the past, Elizabeth Kostova. In an earlier book, The Historian Kostova used the Dracula myth as the centerpiece of a novel that was really about the vocation of history and its implication for placing oneself in life and death situations. It was also a focused study on communist culture in transition in Eastern Europe. She picks up on this later theme in her new novel The Shadow Land, the story of a woman who travels to modern day Bulgaria and is plunged into a mystery that takes into account not only her past, but that of her country and culture in the whole of the twentieth century. The novel is really about the interplay of culture and personality. It is a question that many of us constantly ask ourselves in a melting pot culture such as this one. How does the history of a place both determine and threaten identity? Then, how does the history of a place comfort and reinforce identity? We live and work, day to day in an environment composed on many cultures, many pasts. We confront many cultural realities in the classroom every day. How do we manage all of those realities in ways that are respectful and promote the full dignity of each one? That is ultimately what we strive for, if not universal understanding, then at least a sense of dignity and respect for others. We live in here in the very heart of multi-culturalism and we must learn respect above all things. Elizabeth Kostova’s novel touches on the heart of what we do here, respecting culture, respecting the past, but always living resolutely in the now, toward the future. The ideal of respect as respicere is central to a Benedictine, really to any Catholic institution. It calls to us daily in very practical ways. It challenges us.

    The final book I want to consider is the most outlandish. It is called, The Marvels, and is by Brian Selznick, who authored the book The Invention of Hugo Cabret,  which, in turn, became a wonderful film by Martin Scorsese. Like Hugo, The Marvels  is mostly illustrations. Its 700 pages recount two stories, one story concerns a family of magicians unfolding over 300 years until at last, the magic dies out. The other story, told in prose, concerns a modern family trying to figure out why magic has died out of their lives. We see that the author makes an interesting juxtaposition between illustrative and prosaic living. What does it mean to live an illustrative life? Here I think we come to a necessary component of priestly life, illustrativeness. We present life as priests as much in image as we do in words. The Word presents himself to us more often in images than in logos. We are called to be decipherers of sign and symbol and the guardians of these things. We are called homiletically to illustrate the world and the Word for others through images, painting for them indelible pictures. Our world is told in image and it is in image that magic is brought about. Today, of course, magic has a bad reputation, either as something evil, or as something false. But are we not all called to be magicians, if we mean by magic forging for others a world that is not quite at their disposal. If we mean by magic, the creation of a social order that is different from what we have received, then we are magicians. If we mean by magic a firm resolve to live more into the might be than the IS, we are magicians. But magic is sometimes dying out of the priesthood as much as it is dying out in the prosaic world in which we live. We are told as priests and as citizens of a boring world that we must be realistic, we must be guided by political and economic realities, that we must stifle any magic talk around us and live into the damned now. Do we have the conviction and the courage to be marvels in the world, shamans of an older order that promotes the possible above the pragmatic? Or are we doomed to a prosaic world in which the ultimate benefit of what we offer will be deemed to prosaic for words and will be sluffed off to the dustbin of quaint old things, like so many other magic hats and capes. Can we become magical again in the metaphoric sense of always seeking something beyond what we see before us. There is more here brothers and sisters than meets the eye.

    Finding wonder, finding imagination, discovering the not-yet-discovered, both in the world and in our selves is rare enough today. We must be careful not only NOT to stifle it, we must cultivate it. We must urge creativity, we must prepare our students for encountering a world of possibility.

    These are just some random thoughts for this opening day. Now we must move to the matter at hand. 


  7. Opening Mass Homily - 2017
    September 5, 2017
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB

    But you, brothers and sisters, are not in darkness, for that day to overtake you like a thief. For all of you are children of the light
    and children of the day.
    What a remarkable promise we have today in the words of St. Paul as we begin this new formation year in a formal way.

    What a remarkable promise we have in our community, a community composed of men and women striving to live in the light of Jesus’ Gospel message, a community striving to be good news for one another and for the world in which we live, a world often troubled by war and rumors of war.

    What a remarkable promise we have today in the cultic action we undertake in the Word of God which is retrieved for us day after day, not from the cultural backwash of a former age, but in the Living Word, re-inculcated in our lives by its live and lively proclamation here in this place, waiting to fall as it does on ears eager to receive it.

    And what a remarkable promise we have today at this altar, this living monument, this testament to God’s love by which the awesome sacrifice of Christ is re-initiated here so that we can receive, as far as we are able, the very body and blood soul and divinity of the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, poured out and broken for us in an un-requited act of generosity, the meaning of which continues to unfold of us in every communion.

    What a remarkable promise we have in being called children of the light and of the day. What does that mean?

    It means that there is no darkness of sin, no depth of depravity, no guilt of the past, no shadow of the future, no dimness of action, no enclave of exclusion, no isolation, no insouciance that can keep us from being what we are called to be, not a child of God, but children of God, children of the light and of the day.

    Do we feel that?

    Do we feel redeemed today? Do we feel called today? Do we feel ready today to take up the mantle of Christ, certainly one that is difficult, one that is challenging, saturated as that mantle is in the Blood of the Cross, creased as that mantle is by its mangling on the Hill of Calvary? Do we feel ready to take it up not only in its weight but in its benefit as well?
    For what is the call of Christ but a call to freedom, a call to live into the freedom of God’s sons and daughters, an adoption whose full weight of influence comes on us only gradually, only by shade and degree.

    Do you feel free today, redeemed today and called by God to the glorious ministry to which we have all been summoned? Brothers and sisters there is no other call but that which comes forth from the Word, that which comes forth from the altar. It is a singular call, a call echoing across the ages and across the hills and valleys of the human condition.

    Here is that call.
    God did not destine us for wrath, but to gain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us, so that whether we are awake or asleep we may live together with him.
    What a profound message that is. One that needs to be heard, one that must be heard.

    It must be heard because people are hurting, our brothers and sisters are confounded in their expectations, expectations written in their minds and on their bones, expectations of life in the spirit and yet the spirit becomes crushed, the spirit is laid low by demons.

    Demons whose nomenclature has been changed from Baal and Beelzebub, to more insidious and harder to hunt demons like addiction, self-negation, worthlessness, the burden of sin, the loss of hope, the overtaking of despair, the shadow of doubt, the idolization of fake power, the channeling of the material, the endless chatter of useless talk, the murmur of guilt, the harrowing of personal hells, the harboring of fate.

    Are you overcome by demons? Here is what I say with Jesus: "Be quiet! Come out of him!"

    Come out of her, you have no authority here. Come out and roam the world if you must, or better yet, return to the shadow from which you came.

    You have inflicted our brothers and sisters long enough.

    You have harrowed them long enough.

    You have tortured them long enough.

    Because the living God has use for them. The living God has use for us and so the powers of the underworld can have no power here.

    Our Lord has prepared a certain vision for us and it is this:

    It is a vision of life, life lived to the full, life in which beauty and truth are manifested against the background of shadow and made more vivid by the contrast.

    It is a vision of harmony and love, set against the cacophony of personal tragedy and challenge but emerging moment by moment to sing its clarion notes as the pure music of salvation

    It is a vision of community, of hope and love and joy and laughter set up against the marching melodies of self-preservation and all too one sided image of care and concern.

    Our care and concern for self comes only in our pouring out of ourselves for the care of others

    Finally, what does St. Paul offer the Thessalonians?

    Therefore, encourage one another and build one another up,
    as indeed you do.

    I know this is also true for our community. I know we have it in us today as we celebrate the dedication of this chapel, to re-dedicate ourselves to encouraging one another and building one another up. Just as these walls were erected so long ago, we are brought into our full stature in Christ in order to embrace our sisters and brothers in their fall.

    What does the Gospel say?

    And news of him spread everywhere in the surrounding region.

    That is our mission as well. And so we begin and so we are called in light of so many great promises, we are called here to the fellowship of this altar, blessed, blessed indeed.

    For you, brothers and sisters, are not in darkness,
    for that day to overtake you like a thief.
    For all of you are children of the light
    and children of the day.


  8. Closing Talk for Spirituality Week
    September 1, 2017
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB

    Brothers and sisters, we have come to the end of our spirituality week. It has been a good week, I would say one of the best experiences of this week that I have had. The timbre of Spirituality Week usually indicates something about how the year will unfold. If that is an indication, I believe we can look forward to a good year. What has this week yielded? It is my sincere hope that we have experienced, if not precisely a revelation this week, at least some awakening, some nudging in the direction of the eschaton. I would say the purpose of any exercise like this is less to give me something than to realize what I might need, and then provide me with the tools to find that thing. I hope that in this week we have all become, marginally, better people. Perhaps that is the nature of education in general, which, as we know is a sub-species of formation.

    In my remarks this evening, I would like to wrap up some components of this week by focusing on five challenges that confront us here in this community of formation. Please know as we move into this formation year, that these challenges, indeed all challenges are not to be taken as threats but rather as opportunities for growth. That is the spirit with which they are offered. The first challenge is that of forming mature relationships. That means many things. It means forming mature relationships with each other. It means forming mature relationships with the formation staff. I often say that the movement in a major seminary is a movement toward equality, toward friendship. Mature relationship also applies to those of us on the formation staff. We must demonstrate maturity among ourselves. Likewise, the faculty must demonstrate this. All of us must also show maturity in our primary relationship, that of Christ. We must be mature in the Lord, seeing God not as the threatening deity who punishes, but as the authentic companion, one who provides food for the journey and is indeed our only livelihood. Forming mature relationships means that I have the responsibility not to treat you like children, but you have the responsibility not to act like children. We have the responsibility to grow together into the likeness of Christ. That is what I would like to see this seminary be; a simulacrum of the likeness of Christ. I would like to see Christ as the first iteration of our identity. We do not live in a fraternity house, we live in a house of prayer and study, a house in which we are forming ourselves, not in our baser instincts but as mature men alive in the spirit of Christ Jesus. 

    A second challenge for all of us is responsible collaboration. We must work together. We must be a part of the same project. There is no room for competition here, although in a largely masculine environment that sometimes becomes an issue. Here we must work together to attain our common goal, that of realizing the Kingdom of God in this seminary. God’s indwelling must be here. This is partly, perhaps mostly achieved by a life of prayer, a thorough and meaningful life of prayer. We must be present for prayer. We must see prayer as our priority. We must understand the Holy Mass as the source and summit of our day. As a faculty and staff we have the responsibility to build up our own life of prayer, not only to realize our own salvation, but also to offer to the seminarians, and the rest of our staff and faculty a model and example of prayer. We priests have a particular need to do this, in order to make our priesthood more vivid to others and ourselves. In other words, I challenge the priests of the community to do what we already do well, but can always do better, to show our seminarians that the priesthood is lifegiving, that the priesthood is joyful, that the priesthood is holiness in its most complete form. Here I want to make a particular appeal to all of us for adoration. We have times set aside every day for adoration. How many of us take advantage of that time? You say: it is too early. I say, Our Lord made the sacrifice, you can lose an hour of sleep to spend some precious time with him, some dedicated time in adoration. You can make a Holy Hour each day. I am saying this to each of you. I am challenging each of you. If you are a person with pronounced nocturnal habits, I highly recommend your development of new habits. A great deal of priestly life happens early in the morning. Get up. In the spirit of this, I challenge myself and the whole staff to commit to this practice as well. Our Lord has given us the great gift of presence in that focused way in the exposed Blessed Sacrament. It is a gift. Let’s take advantage of it.

    Third is knowledge of one’s self. We cannot be deceivers of our selves about ourselves. We cannot tell lies to ourselves about how we are doing and who we are. The responsibility to know one’s self is a serious call to spiritual self-awareness, to continual testing and to love of one’s self, in triumphs and talents certainly, but also in flaws. You will hear me say many times that it is through our flaws and challenges that we often become most useful to God’s people. That is certainly true in the confessional. I know it is true in other places as well. You will know in short order that I am a flawed man and that all of the faculty and staff are flawed persons. Our ability to accept and indeed use those flaws becomes the marker of our success. Jesus appeared to the eleven after the resurrection and Thomas would not believe until he had probed the scars. Give people the chance to probe your scars. As it was for Thomas this is often the path to proclaiming: My Lord and my God. Self-knowledge can be a knowledge of tears as well as triumph but there is joy in tears as much as in triumph. If we can cry it means our hearts are tender.

    Fourth is self-correction. How is it possible for us to say we love the Lord, we are his people, his ministers, if we do not every day try to be better? This is an important principle of the Benedictine charism that undergirds the work of this seminary. We strive to be better today than we were yesterday. We look for new ways to excel. We seek out opportunities for excellence. We probe the places of our hearts, our minds, our physicals selves that are in need of improvement and day-by-day we build up, by little and by little into our full stature in Christ. That is what we are striving for in our daily metanoia, full stature in Christ. We can say it with St. Paul: It is no longer I who live but Christ who lives in me. That is the result of the Gospel that we, like St. Paul are called to preach. We are called to be an ambassador for Christ, and nothing more. We are called to service and nothing more. We are called to be men of charity without counting the cost of that charity, and nothing more. We are called to love with every fiber of our being and nothing more. If we can achieve a margin of that here it, bodes well for us. We that something more to which we cling so tightly can be placed to the side, or even cast away, we will have made progress in the life of faith, that life cultivated within ourselves that gives fertility to the ministry to which we have been called.

    Finally there is the ability to trust, trust one another, trust formation, trust in the Lord. Let me quote Galatians again: now that you know God—or rather are known by God—how is it that you are turning back to those weak and miserable forces? Do you wish to be enslaved by them all over again? Here is what I am asking you: Trust your formation here and be able to affirm the good that is being cultivated within you. It is my hope that each one of you can get up in the morning and look in the mirror and see there a wonderful person, a child of God, a follower of Christ and a true minister of the word. Be convinced that that Word is what our world is longing to hear and we know it is because we are longing to hear it. Believe in yourselves. Brothers and sisters our world and our times are in desperate need of Good News. As soon as we can put away bad news and trust ourselves, we will discover the miracle that God intends to offer that world in all of our lives. Your words, your actions, your emotions, your talents, your attitudes all COUNT for something and I want all of that to be made manifest so that our world, beginning in this little corner of Spencer County, can be beautiful and whole.

    That is a vision and that is a hope. I believe the reality of this vision and hope is right within our grasp.

    Please know that I do not wish to place a heavy burden on your back. I do not, but I want to indicate to you the complexity of the particular brand of discipleship we call formation for the priesthood. I also want to assure you of this: I do not challenge you to anything to which I do not challenge myself, the rest of the staff and the faculty. Your relationships, as I have said, with us and among yourselves are built upon the presumption of humility and honesty on all of our parts. Rely on us and we will rely on you. Trust us and one another and the trust of the savior, Jesus Christ, will also be a part of that equation. So our life begins together in joy. Let us see to its fulfillment in exaltation.






  9. August 28, 2017
    Opening Talk for Spirituality Week
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB

    One of the primary duties of any seminary rector and one of the principle tasks for the beginning of any formation year is to ask the axiological question: What are our values? What do we stand for in both a general way and it a particular way? Of course we know that in general we stand for the values of the Gospel. We stand for Jesus Christ. 

    What are the values of this seminary? What do we hope to achieve in our time here? I heard an interesting quote recently from a presenter at a conference I happened to attend this summer. He said that his father said: In every stable there is a donkey. This was a quote from this priest’s father and his father meant it in a somewhat pejorative way, something like this: There will always be stupid people in the world, there will always be stubbornness in the Church. But I wonder, of course, every metaphor both reveals and conceals. I wonder if the image of the donkey though might be an apt image for us in formation.  Of course, I mean myself as well as you. 

    What does the Church today need? We might begin that conversation by asking another question: What does the Church have. Overall, I would say the Church has good and faithful priests, we have hard working priests, and we have men who are willing to get dirty and to take chances not for personal glorification, but that the Word of the Lord might be proclaimed in season and out of season. Some of us might say that we are currently out of season, but I don’t know about that. The Church today needs men who are willing to be authentic shepherds in a time when the occupation of shepherd is, shall we say, underrated. 

    As I said: we often have that. I would like to think that this is just the sort of men that Saint Meinrad is preparing for service in the Lord’s vineyard. But let’s be honest. There are other kinds of priests as well. There are those who look to their own needs and their own values before they look to the needs and values of their flocks. We have some priests who are more like strutting peacocks than servants. We have priests that laugh about intellectual pursuits and prayer. We have priests who look for power and prestige before they look for opportunities for service. We know those priests exists, they are part of a statistic. Each year the Congregation for the Clergy in Rome processes over 800 cases of priests seeking formal dismissal from the clerical state. And that is just those who are seeking a dismissal. Most of those priests come from Europe and North America. Fortunately, very few of them are alumni of Saint Meinrad. How do we get to this impasse? How do we engage a formation program, if we engage a formation program that ultimately produces nothing because it does not offer the Church a priest in the Order of Melichizdek, a man willing to sacrifice everything especially his ego for the sake of proclaiming the Glory of God in the Church? We want men who are ready to be crucified with Christ for the sake of the Gospel. We want men who are willing to look for meaning outside of their particular tastes in serving the people, a people often, perhaps very often ungrateful. We want men whose hearts are broken not only for their own sins but for the sins of the world. We want men of talent, willing to turn every ounce of that talent for use in God’s Kingdom, proclaiming His reign, His justice, His world.  That is what we want? Will we get it with you?

    In my remarks today, I would like to focus on three images from the sixth chapter of St. Matthew’s Gospel. Jesus never fails to do two things in the Gospel. He never fails to offer us something that is comforting, and he never fails to offer us something that is conflicting. Often he offers these simultaneously. That is something that we should expect in formation, a simultaneous comfort and conflict, a consolation and a call by the Lord for growth and change, for conversion. Such is the case in Matthew 6, 16.

    Here is the text:
    Take care not to perform righteous deeds in order that people may see them;a otherwise, you will have no recompense from your heavenly Father. When you give alms, do not blow a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites* do in the synagogues and in the streets to win the praise of others. Amen, I say to you, they have received their reward.
    What is Jesus asking here? We are familiar enough with this text. It is the text offered to us each year on Ash Wednesday. It is a text very much associated with the renewal of our spiritual lives, an opportunity we receive each year in Lent. And yet, I am offering it today, not in the rarified context of our Lenten promises, but in the bright summer sun as we begin this formation year. What does it mean to practice spirituality in secret? Concretely and perhaps superficially it means not blowing our own horns. It means not showing up in the chapel and blowing our metaphorical horns so that everyone can see us and know that we are holy and sanctimonious. That seems obvious.

    But it means something else as well, something that touches the very core of this week, but also the heart of what we try to do here at Saint Meinrad. It means that true conversion is not behavioral, although it certainly has that quality. True conversion is internal, it is about the person within, the person that is not seen at first glance. One of the things I try to reiterate each year is the need for deep and extended vision. I rehearse this with faculty and staff and I try to convince each of you. Do not be quick to judge your fellow seminarians. Do not be quick to judge the faculty and staff. You will hear me say it a thousand times: There is more here than meets the eye. That means that we have to begin all of our relationships with an act of faith, faith that something is going to unfold, something is going to be seen that is not there at first sight. I do believe that priests should be good judges of character, but I also believe that arriving at that judgement may take some time and effort. We are going to give you time and we are going to make the effort, but you must do that as well. 

    The next passage in St. Matthew’s Gospel also tells us something essential. It is the Lord’s prayer, a part of our lives that is unequaled in the quality of prayer. In the prayer, we address God as Father. Tertullian calls this a privilege, the privilege par excellence of our intimate relationship with the Son. The intimacy of the Aramaic word abba, is an intimacy of confidence. Our relationship with God, in our discipleship and here in this seminary is one founded on a kind of boldness, the boldness of endearment. It allows us to approach with confidence the God of time and space. It gives us the faith and courage to understand that our daily lives are lived in the shadow of the cross, but not the cross as a sign of punishment, rather the cross as a sign of unfeigned love. St. Cyprian says that God is not made holy be degrees, rather our love for God is brought to fruition by degrees. In the Lord ’s Prayer we are learning by little and by little how to love God as He must be loved because of who he is. Our intimacy with the Divine Master does not make him greater, rather it invites us to be greater. That intimacy with the Father is fostered and nurtured by our intimacy with one another. This is the stage of that intimacy. As we progress further in the prayer, we learn how that intimacy is nurtured. Forgive us as we forgive. No one in the room here today is perfect. I am not perfect. You are not perfect. Our ability to love one another is not built in a climate, a hothouse of perfection. No one could bear to exist in such a place and any institution in the Church that professes perfection is a lying institution. Our perfection exists in acknowledging who we are, acknowledging our faults and in knowing those faults, being willing to forgive the faults of others. In the coming year, you will have many opportunities to forgive one another. You will have the opportunity to forgive me as I will you. The power to forgive lies in our ability to touch that core in ourselves that knows we are sinners. Our inability to forgive others comes from our false claims to perfection. No one here can commit a sin that is more severe than anything I have done in my life. God forgives all. We must also forgive. That will come in the give and take of daily life here. Does our loving one another and forgiving one another mean that we will all be friends, perhaps not, but if we cannot all be friends, at least we will not be enemies.

    I will now move on to the last section of Matthew Chapter Six:
    Seek first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.
    We cannot serve two masters. There is a truth there that only comes with maturity. As you know, or will know, I spend a good bit of time studying the sociological studies relating to young folks today. I have only recently come to the conclusion that I am no longer one of you. Part of the sociological profile of your generation is the desire to “keep your options open”. Brothers I understand that nature within you, I also understand that it is incongruent with the pursuit of a vocation to the priesthood. Formation for the priesthood demands a singlemindedness that is unparalleled in the world we inhabit today. A true sense of vocation means pursuing an end relentlessly and with such focus of heart, soul and mind that it cannot be set aside, even for a moment. The death of the vocation is doubt. The death of the vocation is duplicitousness. You cannot serve both God and mammon. You cannot serve two masters. The Gospel life calls us to a simplicity, not only acknowledged in simplicity of life, but acknowledged foremost in an unwavering pursuit of the ends of God, the telos of God, which have become our ends, our telos. What does the Gospel tell us: Do not be anxious. God provides. A test for us today is to ask ourselves how deeply, how thoroughly we believe that: God provides. The providence of God is a major theme of formation. To a great extent, your success here is dependent upon your willingness to cast all of yourself onto the providence of God. Give everything to God. Give him your hopes and dreams. Give him your cares and concerns. Give him your sin. Give him your virtue. Give him your sexuality. Give him your celibacy. Give him your intellect. Give him your stupidity. Give him your sense of wonder. Give him your depression. Give him your seeking. Seek first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness and all of these things will be given to you. Do not be anxious about tomorrow. Tomorrow will take care of itself. Care about yourself today and foster one thing during these coming days, a deeper, more personal, intimate relationship with the Master in prayer. IF we have that, we have everything.  

    Brothers, many blessings as we begin this spirituality week. I pray that you take it seriously and that you gain immense benefits from it. Use this time to deepen your resolve and your faith. Use this time to become more fully the man you are called to be. Use this time to love more deeply. Use this time to mend fences both here and at home. Use this time of prayer and reflection on God’s providence to extend that providence to all you know and all you meet. Entertain the unseen God as readily as you entertain one another. Learn from God as easily as your learn from your professors. This week will yield a harvest of as much as you are willing to sow. God has promised and he will do it. 

    Image Source


  10. August 27, 2017
    Twenty-First Sunday in Ordinary Time
    Very Rev. Denis Robinson, OSB
    Upon this rock I will build my church,
    and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.
    I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven.
    The passage we have from St. Matthew’s Gospel is certainly familiar to Catholics, particularly anyone who has been to St. Peter’s basilica in Rome where it is festooned around the walls in Greek and Latin, familiar to anyone who has studied the life of the Church, particularly for those of us who have at least some understanding of the ideal of magisterium and papal primacy. It is the great commissioning of Peter, his being named as the man among the fallen and broken disciples, in his own fallen and brokenness, being named to lead the Church. He is ordered by Jesus to build the Church, to construct the ecclesia on the cornerstone of Christ not because our Lord does not see Peter’s brokenness. He has more opportunities in the Gospel to rebuke him than to praise him. Jesus knows his brokenness and yet he calls him, precisely in that brokenness to be the image, the symbol of Church life. That brokenness is strength. It is power. It is authority.

    Is that not also the case with us? In our need and in our fragility each one of us has been called here to a particular mission. We have been called to discernment, and more than discernment. Like Peter, we have been called to the preparation for a ministry that we cannot yet fully imagine. We are called to a service that we cannot yet completely fathom. We are called to a mystery, the aching parameters of which we have in our minds, but that must be seen not as something accomplished but rather as something toward which we strive, fully engaged. 

    Let’s be honest, Rocky was not the brightest boy in the world, but he understood one thing, even if he didn’t always live it, he understood that in Jesus there was a presence in his life that demanded total commitment, not by virtue of a will to power, but by virtue of who Jesus is. Jesus gave Peter keys of understanding because he, and only he, had the power to give those keys. I will give you the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven.

    What are those keys?

    They are the keys of faith, faith drawn from the very marrow of our bones, infused into our life in the milk of our mothers. Faith that calls us to acts of heroism in the face of overwhelming cowardice, faith that enables us to mount the heights of the Zion of human expectations when we are fearful and hopeless. These keys are the keys of faith. 

    And they are the keys of life. They are the keys of that life that once walked the streets of Jerusalem, a Jerusalem divided like today between the haves and have nots, between warring factions of the Sons of Abraham. Life that murmurs assent in the frosty chill of despair and warms the internal recesses of the human condition with glory and light. The keys which Jesus gives are the keys of life.

    They are the keys of hope. A hope that is often hard-earned and hard-preached. Brothers and sisters we need some ray of hope in our world today. The daily headlines are filled with anguish and mendacity. Our brothers and sisters are drowning in a sea of bad news and their one lifeline, their one anchor must be the Gospel that we preach. If we can preach the Gospel and if we can do it without compromise then the message of Jesus can become that hope, but that promise is centered on us, it is centered on those here. By our call, we are its fulfillment. The hope of the world rests upon the message we are called to preach, the message we are called to live. 
    Upon this rock I will build my church,
    and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.
    I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven.
    They are the keys of promise, a promise so rich, so beautiful that we must faint before it, we must be blinded by the awe of that promise. It is a promise that puts down the powers of this world and its menacing shade, a promise that trails its tendrils across the paths of our endeavors and makes us reach for the stars. It is a promise that itself eclipses doom, negativity, vice. Jesus offers us the keys of promise, the promise that the rest of our lives can be lived more fruitfully than the first years, more holy than what we have seen, the promise that day by day we are inching toward beatitude. They are the keys of promise.

    And they are the keys of joy. What joy we have in this celebration today, a celebration not only of the Body of Christ, not only of the presence of our dear Savior here, physically in our midst, but the joy of being in him, in this place, with one another. Let us not kill the joy these keys promise by our own cynical ways, our destructive attitudes. 

    These are the keys promised to Peter, promised to the Church, the keys of our self-understanding.

    And brothers and sisters, hell cannot prevail against this promise.
    Upon this rock I will build my church,
    and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. 
    Hell cannot infect us with its sulfurous gasps, its creaking substructure of isolation, ugliness, 

    Hell cannot threaten us with the sin of our forebears; casting in our path the apple core of deceit because that path has been repaved with the blood of Jesus, that path has been reformed with his life, a new path is set out for us which has nothing to do with Hell.

    And so, Hell cannot engage us with its penetrating wall of fire and ice. Hell cannot touch us with the fire that can never illuminate the true way. And what way is it? Hell with its labyrinthine paths that lead to nowhere when the true path is so easy to know and see: Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! The path to those riches and wisdom and knowledge is not unknown to us. Live the life. Search for the truth. Abandon despair. Abjure the lie of godlessness. 

    Hell cannot prevail if we have turned our lives over to God in Christ. Brothers and sisters we are not bound for hell. We are bound for heaven.

    We are bound for heaven. We must see moment by moment its gates opening wide for us, the luster of pearl and jewels, opening for us in this Eucharist. We must see the gates of heaven opened for us in the Word of God as we proclaim it boldly and fearlessly. We are bound to pass through those gates, and even here into the bounty of an everlasting life that cannot be staunched by our temporality. 

    We are made for heaven.  We want to march on its streets, streets that are made of jasper but look for the world like terrazzo hallways. And we see in those streets angels and denizens of infinity that look like our own brothers and sisters because they are our brothers and sisters, not crippled by the sulfuric belching of the earthquake of Hell, but emboldened to parade those streets by God’s command of love. 

    We are created for heaven and I wish that I could unfold for you a map of that city. I wish I could lay out for you its gates, its streets, to let you know what glory, what sheer glory the Lord of Hosts has prepared for each of us. 

    Can you believe it? Do you believe it? Can you put aside for one day one moment the lies told in our childhoods, the lack of self-worth, and the sins of the past? Can WE put those aside to live in the light of God’s universal promise? 

    Those gates, those streets, that map are engrained in our DNA, inscribed in the marrow of our bones, fixed in the infinitude of our minds. 
    Upon this rock I will build my church,
    and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.
    I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven.
    And we have that promise; we need only reach out for it, only reach out our hands in prayer, in friendship, in the reception of this Sacrament. Let us begin our new formation year this way. Let us be women and men of authentic outreach, beholding in each the Lamb of God. Let us see one another with eyes of hope, as Our Lord did for the troubled and troubling Simon. Let us resolve with Christ to build our Church and to build it strong and fearless so that the Gates of Hell have no authority over this place. Let us hold those keys in our hands and feel their wondrous weight and know in them, the only key, Jesus, who is ours, who is Lord forever and ever. 

    Image Source

Subscribe
Subscribe
Fr. Denis Robinson, OSB
Fr. Denis Robinson, OSB
Fr. Denis Robinson, OSB

Fr. Denis Robinson, OSB, is president-rector of Saint Meinrad School of Theology in St. Meinrad, IN. A Benedictine monk, he is also an assistant professor of systematic theology. A Mississippi native, Fr. Denis attended Saint Meinrad College and School of Theology, earning a bachelor's degree in philosophy in 1989 and a Master of Divinity in 1993. From 1993-97, he was parochial vicar for the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Memphis, TN. He joined the Saint Meinrad monastery in August 1997. Fr. Denis also attended the Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium, where he received a master’s degree in theology in 2002, a licentiate in sacred theology in 2003, and doctorates in sacred theology and philosophy in 2007.

View my complete profile
Links
Blog Archive
Categories
Loading
Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger. Report Abuse.